Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marcus McDaniel vs Collin Altamirano Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our McDaniel vs Altamirano analysis and find out who is favored!
Marcus McDaniel vs Collin Altamirano Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: McDaniel 1 - 0 Altamirano
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), McDaniel has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Altamirano has won 46.37%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show McDaniel, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Altamirano has won 52.53%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 34.4% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: McDaniel has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Altamirano has saved 58.58% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year McDaniel has won 62.5% of matches played (W/L 15/ 9), with Altamirano winning 59.02% (W/L 36/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: McDaniel has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 75% (W/L 3/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 19/ 13). Altamirano has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 140/ 91), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 6/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, McDaniel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 15/ 9), where as Altamirano has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.4% of matches (W/L 35/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with McDaniel winning 1 times and Altamirano being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with McDaniel winning 2 and Altamirano winning 0. The last match between McDaniel and Altamirano was at the M25 Harlingen, 26-10-2023, Second, Hard with Marcus McDaniel getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:37:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: McDaniel and Altamirano have played a deciding set 0 times, with McDaniel winning 0 times and Altamirano 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with McDaniel winning 0, and Altamirano 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, McDaniel has played against opponents with an average rank of 70.92 while Altamirano has played against players with an average rank of 102.95.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, McDaniel has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Altamirano has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, McDaniel has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Altamirano has converted 44.64% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
849
Rank
267
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
62% (24-15)
Career Total W/L
57% (208-158)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
50% (14-14)
$0
Career Prize Money
$67,351
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Marcus McDaniel vs Collin Altamirano For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For McDaniel VS Altamirano
Sportsbook
Offer
McDaniel VS Altamirano H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Marcus McDaniel | Collin Altamirano |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 2 |
| DFs Total | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:0 | 1:37:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (33/60) | 57% (30/53) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (24/33) | 73% (22/30) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (16/27) | 26% (6/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 14% (1/7) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (25/53) | 33% (20/60) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
McDaniel VS Altamirano H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Marcus McDaniel
Player
Collin Altamirano
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marcus McDaniel | Collin Altamirano |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (14/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (34/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (317/295) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (8/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.36 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 107 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 63 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:38:57 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 60.82 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 60% (994/1669) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (696/994) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (313/675) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 45% (75/168) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (709/1717) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 52% (13/12) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 52% (14/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (4/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 80% (15/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 13% (15/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 15% (13/2) |
Marcus McDaniel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Franco Capalbo
Player
Marcus McDaniel
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcus McDaniel
Player
Henry Lieberman
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
76
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Marcus McDaniel
54%
(
55 of
102)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
5
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
4
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
99
Total Points Won
95
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcus McDaniel
Player
Warren Wood
48%
(
23 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
46%
(
22 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
54
Total Points Won
56
|
1-6 5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF | 3-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Raphael Perot
Player
Marcus McDaniel
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
84)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marcus McDaniel
Player
Collin Altamirano
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcus McDaniel
Player
Nathan Ponwith
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
65)
14
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
28 of
34)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Collin Altamirano Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Matthew Summers
Player
Collin Altamirano
74%
(
59 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
22 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Collin Altamirano
Player
Derek Pham
59%
(
58 of
99)
1st Serve %
44%
(
41 of
94)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
10
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
94)
103
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Collin Altamirano
Player
Justin Boulais
61%
(
68 of
112)
1st Serve %
74%
(
81 of
109)
6
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
50 of
81)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
38%
(
43 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
109)
113
Total Points Won
108
|
5-7 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Collin Altamirano
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Collin Altamirano
Player
Jacob Brumm
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Collin Altamirano
Player
Christopher Bulus
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
Player
Collin Altamirano
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Collin Altamirano
Player
Jacob Brumm
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Collin Altamirano
Player
Derek Pham
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Collin Altamirano
57%
(
58 of
101)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
4
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
1
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
48%
(
48 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
McDaniel Vs Altamirano Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of McDaniel are available here and Altamirano photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
